Microanalytics™-A MOCON® Company

Microanalytics™
"a unique kind of sensory company"

  2011A Lamar Drive
  Round Rock, TX  78664
  (512) 218-9873     FAX (512) 218-9875

Sensory-Directed Odor Analysis


Home
 
 



Press Release

New Book with Microanalytics Contribution

"Sensory-Directed Flavor Analysis" Ray Marsili, Ed. Taylor & Francis Press 2006

More Information


Air and Waste Management Association Meeting


Specialty
Site Links

 

 
 


Overview


During the past two decades, hundreds of potential odorants have been reported in the literature for CAFO odor sources. However, recent work by these researchers as well as others suggests that from this very large suite of ‘potential’ odor contributors, community odor complaints (i.e. at distance from the CAFO sources) may be largely driven by a relatively small number of chemicals drawn from this very large field. However, the concept of such prioritization relative to downwind odor impact has not been without controversy within the industry.  This controversy has ranged from complete denial that any such prioritization of key odorants is definable to apparent differences with regard to the minimum size, odorant composition or simply the impact priority ranking of the odorants within the critical subset. Establishing that a consensus subset of priority odorants is definable for this application is essential if sensory ‘only’ based monitoring protocols are to be successfully translated to instrument based (i.e. with sensory oversight) alternatives.

The prioritization of odor emissions from CAFO sources and increased understanding of how this prioritization impacts sampling and analysis strategies has been at the center of the on-going collaborative efforts. For example, the first objective of the current Phase I USDA SBIR project is to confirm or disprove the results of previous odorant prioritization results which indicate that p-cresol may be the single most prominent odorant emission from these CAFO sources (i.e. with respect to distance downwind community impact). If proven correct, such confirmation greatly increases the importance of  the second objective of the same study which is the development of alternatives to the industry standard Tedlar bag for whole-air odor sampling. This importance is driven by recent studies verifying the rapid loss of p-cresol and other high priority semi-volatile odorants when utilizing Tedlar and other plastic bags for whole-air odor sampling. 

A number of past and future technical papers, posters, reports and journal manuscripts have emerged from the collaborative efforts of Don Wright, founder and President of Microanalytics; Dr. Jacek Koziel, Assistant Professor at ISU; Dr. David Parker, Associate Professor at West Texas A&M University and the numerous associates from each of these organizations. Among the related publications and technical papers are the following:

List of Publications

 


 
 
   

 


All Content - ©Microanalytics  1990-2009